Print 
1: The pure theory of money
Page
86
Turn right 90°Turn left 90°
  
  
  
  
  
 
Download single image
 

86

A TREATISE ON MONEY

BK. II

prices, round which are scattered the moving price-levels of individual things. There are all the various,quite definite, conceptions of price-levels of compositecommodities appropriate for various purposes andinquiries which have been scheduled above, and manyothers too. There is nothing else. Jevons was pur-suing a mirage.

What is the flaw in the argument ? In the firstplace it is assumed that the fluctuations of individualprices round the mean are random in thesense required by the Theory of the Combination ofIndependent Observations. In this theory the di-vergence of one observation from the true positionis assumed to have no influence on the divergences ofother observations. But in the case of prices amovement in the price of one commodity necessarilyinfluences the movement in the prices of other com-modities , 1 whilst the magnitudes of these compensa-tory movements depend on the magnitude of thechange in expenditure on the first commodity as com-pared with the importance of the expenditure on thecommodities secondarily affected. Thus, instead of independence, there is between the errors inthe successive observations what some writers on'Probability have called connexity, or, as Lexisexpressed it, there is sub-normal dispersion.

We cannot, therefore, proceed further until wehave enunciated the appropriate law of connexity.But the law of connexity cannot be enunciated with-out reference to the relative importance of the com-modities affectedwhich brings us back to the problemthat we have been trying to avoid, of weighting the

1 Divisia ( LIndice monetaire, Revue d'Economic politique, 1925, p.S58) has been one of the very few writers to point this out quite clearly.See also Olivier, Les Nombres Indices, pp. 106, 107. M. Divisia shows,not only that the non-independence of relative price changes is conclusiveagainst the applicability of the Gaussian Law of Error, but also that it is agratuitous assumption that a so-called monetary cause, however defined,will affect all prices equally.